“Oh, I was so happy when I was told you were in the panel!” It is always nice that someone is pleased with your presence, but this surprised me a bit. The OECD employee who made this confession had only just met me in the taxi that would bring us to the conference. Seeing my puzzled face, she explained that in 2018, the OECD issued guidelines that ask employees to only accept invitations for conference panels that include at least one female speaker.[1]

On an even wider scale and in line with the fifth United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality, the UN Global Compact Panel Pledge was established in 2016. This is a global effort to help ending all-male panels (also referred to as ‘manels’). UN staff members were called on to pledge not to take part in or to host panels comprised only of men. To take the pledge global, the UN Global Compact encouraged its 68 Local Networks and over 12,000 companies around the world to make their own pledges to bring gender balance to conferences and events. In addition, they were asked to share their commitment via Twitter at #PanelPledge.

Why strive for gender balance?

International organisations take such actions for good reason. Manels, for example, may not recognize unconscious biases, lead to tunnel vision, neglect certain topics and perspectives, and confirm stereotypes. Guidelines such as the OECD’s and pledges advocated by the UN help raising awareness of congress organisers, funders of seminars, and other speakers. Therefore, they go beyond the individual employee or company taking the pledge. In addition to gender balance, other factors, such as a balance in the cultural background of speakers, are important to make sure that panels are not just inclusive by the looks of it, but also by the outcomes they generate.

Let’s talk about tax

Tax seminars with only white male speakers are not unheard of. In my experience, this is usually not by malicious intent, but more because of habit (inviting the people in your own circle) and unawareness of the drawbacks of such manels. I have the feeling that especially the more internationally oriented part of the private tax sector is aware of this issue and tries to avoid organising manels, but that awareness might be less in the public sector, which includes universities. This might also have to do with differences in generations. It seems that younger women and men are more aware of the importance of diversity for obtaining the best results.

As manels are still not uncommon in my own country, the Netherlands, I tried to raise awareness in the way that suits me best: by writing an article about it. International colleagues pointed out to me that manels are not just an issue in Dutch tax seminars. For that reason, this guest blog does not only want to raise the awareness of the international tax world, but also provide tips to help making tax manels extinct species in the near future.

What can we do about it?

The elimination of manels is a joint responsibility of conference organisers, speakers, providers of financial and human resources, and women. Therefore, I give some simple tips for each of these groups. These suggestions are not very original, but they are effective.

Organizers

Everything starts with conference organizers as they select the speakers. My advice to organizers who do not know any female experts on a topic: consult a female colleague, someone outside your own network. And also: if a woman says ‘no’, do not give up, but ask her to suggest another female expert and, more importantly, keep looking. The common excuse that you tried, but women were unavailable will just not do. And please note diversity also means not always asking the same women (and men)!

To enhance speaker diversity, it may help to try the ‘paper proposal’ model, instead of the ‘invited speakers’ model that is customary in continental European tax conferences. The paper proposal model is regularly used in other academic fields, but also, for example, in the yearly UK/Irish Tax Research Network conference. It allows anyone to submit a paper proposal. The best proposals are selected for the conference. In the 2019 Lund GREIT conference on Tax Sustainability in an EU and International Context we tried this model. As is evidenced by the conference book, this resulted in a diverse and high-quality group of speakers with usual and unusual suspects. They approached the subject from various angles that were in some cases also not expected by us. Mateusz Lewandowski, for example, spoke at the conference about tax policy measures to counteract energy poverty, a concept that was rather unknown at the time, but that is now in every day’s newspapers.

Speakers

Are you invited as a speaker for a manel? Suggest a woman as an alternative or co-speaker. If you accidentally end up in a manel, contact the organizer about it. ‘Superstar tax speakers’ even have a greater responsibility in this regard: by speaking up you can change the system. There are plenty of other tax conferences at which you can present.

Providers of financial and human resources

Funders of conferences and employers of potential speakers also have a role to play. This is especially the case for governmental organizations, universities and companies that claim to attach great importance to diversity. They can follow the example of the OECD and the UN and refuse to finance manels, issue guidelines that no manels are to be organized from within their organization and ask their employees not to participate in manels.

Women

It takes two to tango. More diversity is not just a responsibility of conference organizers, but also of potential female speakers. Women should not be overcome by insecurity or modesty and immediately say ‘no’ when asked to speak. Apparently, the organizer is of the opinion that you are knowledgeable on the topic, so why not accept the invitation? If you are not available or if it is not your topic: feel obliged to suggest another woman.

To conclude

If we want to make sure that our tax conferences deliver the best results, explore all possible angles of a topic, and are an inspiration to all tax scholars and practitioners, diversity of the speakers group is key. We tax people can make our own ‘no more tax manels’ pledge. Not necessarily by signing websites, but, much more importantly, by simple and concrete individual actions. Together we can make this happen.

[1] An excerpt of these Guidelines for OECD staff can be found on page 11 of Christal Morehouse, Alla Volkova, Silvia Fierăscu, An end to manels: closing the gender gap at Europe’s top policy events, Open Society Foundations, 6 March 2018, https://www .opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/end-manels-closing-gender-gap-europe-s-top-policy-events .

 


________________________

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer International Tax Blog, please subscribe here.


Kluwer International Tax Law

The 2021 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 77% of the legal professionals experience an increased importance of legal technology. Kluwer International Tax Law is an intuitive research platform for Tax Professionals leveraging Wolters Kluwer’s top international content and practical tools providing answers. You can easily access the tool from every preferred location. Are you, as a Tax professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer International Tax Law can support you.

Kluwer International Tax Law
This page as PDF

One comment

  1. Thanks for highlighting this issue, Sigrid. I’ve had the impression for a number of years now that women are more visible in the VAT world than in the wider tax conference networks. Perhaps I haven’t looked closely enough, but certainly I did not even register that I was on an all women panel (wanel?) until the non-female chair commented on it. And it wasn’t because we were allocated a “female” topic… in fact, it was the headline topic, and the first session of the conference.

    I think it would be good to focus on the gender balance in the conference as a whole, rather than each panel. An occassional all-female panel might normalise women’s participation as much as, or more than, a token women in each otherwise male-dominated panel.

    Thanks to your timely reminder, I will take more note of gender, cultural, and perspective balance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *